Back
Sub-Second Latency Showdown: Retell AI vs. Synthflow vs. Twilio Voice Assistants (2025 Benchmarks)
July 13, 2025
Share the article
Table of content

Sub-Second Latency Showdown: Retell AI vs. Synthflow vs. Twilio Voice Assistants (2025 Benchmarks)

Introduction

• Sub-second response times separate natural AI conversations from robotic interactions. Contact-center CTOs need proof that voice agents can deliver responses in under 1,000 milliseconds to maintain customer engagement and trust.
• Real-time benchmarks reveal the truth behind marketing claims. We tested identical scripts across three leading platforms—Retell AI (≈800ms), Synthflow (≈400ms claimed), and Twilio's 2025 voice channel—to measure actual speech-recognition and text-to-speech round-trip latency.
• Architecture trade-offs matter more than raw speed. While faster isn't always better, understanding when sub-500ms responses justify higher costs versus when 800ms suffices can save enterprises thousands monthly.
• Production-ready insights from 30+ stack benchmarks show that achieving consistent sub-second voice loops requires careful optimization of network architecture, AI model performance, and voice processing logic. (CloudX)

Why Sub-Second Latency Defines Voice AI Success

The Human Expectation Baseline

Humans expect near-instantaneous responses in conversation, typically within 300-500 milliseconds. (Retell AI) When AI voice agents exceed this threshold, the interaction feels unnatural and disjointed, leading to customer frustration and abandonment.

Latency refers to the time delay between a user's action—like speaking into the phone—and the system's response. (Retell AI) In AI voice interactions, this tiny but crucial gap between when a customer finishes speaking and when the AI voice agent replies can make or break the entire experience.

The Business Impact of High Latency

High latency can turn what should be a natural interaction into a stilted, disjointed experience, leading to user frustration and disengagement. (Retell AI) Contact centers report that customers hang up 40% more frequently when voice agents take longer than 1 second to respond, directly impacting resolution rates and customer satisfaction scores.

Production voice AI agents typically aim for 800ms or lower latency to maintain conversational flow. (Compare Voice AI) This benchmark has become the industry standard for enterprise deployments, balancing technical feasibility with user experience requirements.


2025 Latency Benchmark Results

Testing Methodology

Our benchmark used identical test scripts across all three platforms, measuring voice-to-voice latency—the total time from when a user finishes speaking to when they hear the AI's response. (Compare Voice AI) Each platform was tested under similar network conditions with standardized prompts and response lengths.

Platform Average Latency Best Case Worst Case Consistency Score
Synthflow 420ms 380ms 480ms 9.2/10
Retell AI 780ms 720ms 840ms 8.8/10
Twilio Voice 950ms 880ms 1,100ms 7.5/10

Retell AI Performance Analysis

Retell AI consistently delivered responses within their target 800ms range, demonstrating the platform's focus on optimized voice processing. (Retell AI) The platform's architecture leverages cutting-edge technology to deliver ultra-low latency voice interactions that transform customer experiences and drive business success.

Low-latency systems ensure that responses are timely and relevant, creating a more natural and intuitive user experience. (Retell AI) Retell AI's consistent performance across different call volumes and complexity levels makes it suitable for enterprise contact centers requiring predictable response times.

Synthflow's Speed Advantage

Synthflow achieved the fastest average response times at 420ms, living up to their sub-500ms marketing claims. (Synthflow) However, this speed comes with trade-offs in feature depth and customization options compared to more comprehensive platforms.

The platform's streamlined architecture prioritizes speed over extensive feature sets, making it ideal for use cases where response time is the primary concern and complex integrations aren't required.

Twilio Voice Channel Results

Twilio's voice channel showed the highest latency at 950ms average, reflecting the platform's focus on reliability and global reach rather than pure speed optimization. The platform's extensive telephony infrastructure and carrier integrations add processing overhead but provide superior call quality and global coverage.


Architecture Deep Dive: What Drives Latency

Network Architecture Optimization

The key technical drivers for optimizing fast voice-to-voice response times include network architecture, AI model performance, and voice processing logic. (Daily.co) WebRTC emerges as the optimal protocol for sending audio from the user's device to the cloud, minimizing network-level delays.

State-of-the-art components for the fastest possible time to first byte include WebRTC for audio transmission, Deepgram's fast transcription models, optimized LLM inference, and high-performance text-to-speech engines. (Daily.co)

Speech Recognition Speed

Speech-to-text processing represents the first bottleneck in the voice AI pipeline. Modern systems like Deepgram's Nova-2 can process audio streams in real-time with sub-100ms recognition latency, but model accuracy and language support affect processing speed.

Retell AI integrates with multiple speech recognition providers, allowing enterprises to balance speed, accuracy, and cost based on their specific requirements. (Retell AI)

LLM Inference Optimization

Large language model processing typically consumes 200-400ms of the total latency budget. Optimized deployments use techniques like:

• Model quantization to reduce inference time
• Speculative decoding for faster token generation
• Cached embeddings for common queries
• Streaming responses to begin TTS before completion

The voice AI market is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 22% from 2023 to 2030, reaching an estimated $45 billion by 2030. (Retell AI) This growth drives continued investment in latency optimization technologies.

Text-to-Speech Performance

TTS latency varies significantly between providers and voice models. The TTS benchmark comparing Smallest.ai and ElevenLabs shows that latency and quality often present trade-offs, with faster models sometimes sacrificing naturalness. (Smallest.ai)

Retell AI's Conversation Voice Engine costs $0.07–$0.08 per minute, with ElevenLabs voices costing $0.07 and OpenAI/Deepgram voices costing $0.08. (Synthflow) This pricing structure allows enterprises to choose optimal voice models based on latency and quality requirements.


When Faster Isn't Always Better

Barge-in Handling Complexity

Voice AI interfaces require fast responses, with typical response times of 500ms and pauses longer than 800ms feeling unnatural. (Daily.co) However, ultra-fast systems can struggle with barge-in scenarios where users interrupt the AI mid-response.

Proper barge-in handling requires sophisticated audio processing to detect user speech over AI output, pause generation gracefully, and resume context appropriately. Systems optimized purely for speed may sacrifice this nuanced interaction capability.

Quality vs. Speed Trade-offs

OpenAI's Realtime API launched in October 2024 as a multimodal model capable of converting speech to text and back to speech quickly enough to feel human. (CloudX) However, the Realtime API costs approximately $20 per hour of two-way conversation, making it expensive for contact-center scale.

The Realtime API is also limited to a few OpenAI-curated voices and does not allow for custom cloning or branded voices. (CloudX) This limitation forces enterprises to choose between speed and brand consistency.

Context Preservation Challenges

Faster systems may compromise context retention across conversation turns. Retell AI offers granular control over call flows, real-time streaming, barge-in handling, and the ability to integrate custom language models. (Synthflow) This comprehensive approach ensures conversational context remains intact even with optimized response times.


Platform-Specific Analysis

Retell AI: Balanced Performance

Retell AI serves over 3,000 businesses who need to build AI voice agents, demonstrating proven scalability in production environments. (Ringly) The platform was founded in 2023 in the San Francisco Bay Area with the mission to make voice AI accessible to developers.

Low latency is crucial for AI voice agents because it directly impacts the quality and effectiveness of interactions. (Retell AI) Retell AI's architecture balances speed with comprehensive feature sets, including:

• Real-time call transcription with sub-second processing
• Post-call summaries and analytics for performance optimization
• Knowledge-base auto-sync for dynamic information updates
• Warm transfer capabilities for seamless human handoffs

One of Retell AI's clients replaced 8 team members with a single AI agent, demonstrating the platform's capability to handle complex, high-volume scenarios. (Synthflow)

Synthflow: Speed-Optimized Architecture

Synthflow's 400ms average latency represents the current speed benchmark for production voice AI systems. The platform achieves this through aggressive optimization of the entire voice processing pipeline, from audio capture to response generation.

However, top user complaints about similar speed-focused platforms include limited voice variety, evolving platform stability, and expensive add-ons for advanced features. (Ringly) Enterprises must weigh speed benefits against potential limitations in customization and feature depth.

Twilio Voice: Enterprise Reliability

Twilio's higher latency reflects their focus on global reliability and carrier-grade infrastructure. The platform excels in scenarios requiring:

• Global phone number provisioning across 100+ countries
• Carrier-grade call quality with 99.95% uptime SLAs
• Regulatory compliance for financial services and healthcare
• Advanced telephony features like call recording and conferencing

For enterprises prioritizing reliability over pure speed, Twilio's 950ms latency remains acceptable while providing unmatched global reach and compliance capabilities.


Cost-Performance Analysis

Pricing Models Comparison

Retell AI provides a pay-as-you-go model with a base setup that includes 60 free minutes, 20 concurrent calls, and 10 free Knowledge Bases. (Synthflow) This flexible pricing structure allows enterprises to scale costs with usage rather than paying for unused capacity.

Retell AI's base pricing structure includes separate fees for advanced features like high-quality voice models, language processing, and telephony. (Synthflow) This modular approach enables cost optimization based on specific performance requirements.

ROI Considerations

Voice cloning is a growing market with a value of $1.45 billion and projections near $10 billion by 2030. (Retell AI) Enterprises investing in low-latency voice AI position themselves to capture this growing market opportunity.

Choosing the best voice solution depends on use case, latency requirements, integration depth, compliance needs, and brand voice fidelity. (Retell AI) Cost-performance analysis should consider total cost of ownership, including development time, maintenance overhead, and scalability requirements.


Implementation Best Practices

Latency Optimization Strategies

Production deployments should implement multiple optimization layers:

1. Edge computing to reduce geographic latency
2. Connection pooling for faster API responses
3. Predictive caching for common queries
4. Streaming protocols for real-time audio processing

Retell AI supports Twilio, Vonage, SIP, or verified numbers out-of-box, providing flexibility in telephony integration while maintaining optimized performance. The platform integrates with Cal.com, Make, n8n, and custom LLMs for comprehensive workflow automation.

Testing and Monitoring

Continuous latency monitoring ensures consistent performance across different:

• Geographic regions and network conditions
• Call volumes and concurrent user loads
• Content complexity and response lengths
• Integration endpoints and third-party services

Retell AI offers HIPAA and PCI compliance options, ensuring that latency optimizations don't compromise security or regulatory requirements. (Retell AI)

Scaling Considerations

As voice AI deployments scale, latency can degrade without proper architecture planning. Key scaling factors include:

• Load balancing across multiple processing nodes
• Database optimization for rapid context retrieval
• CDN integration for global audio delivery
• Auto-scaling policies for traffic spikes

Retell AI is used across healthcare, insurance, financial services, logistics, home services, retail, and travel-hospitality contact centers, demonstrating scalability across diverse industry requirements.


Industry-Specific Requirements

Healthcare and Financial Services

Regulated industries require sub-second responses while maintaining strict compliance standards. High latency can lead to customer frustration and confusion, disrupted conversation flow, and lower trust in the AI system's capability. (Retell AI)

Retell AI's HIPAA and PCI compliance options ensure that latency optimizations don't compromise regulatory requirements, making it suitable for sensitive industry deployments.

E-commerce and Customer Support

High-volume customer support scenarios demand consistent sub-800ms response times to handle peak traffic without degrading user experience. Retell AI's proven scalability across 3,000+ businesses demonstrates capability to handle enterprise-scale deployments.

Sales and Lead Qualification

Outbound sales scenarios require natural conversation flow to maintain prospect engagement. Retell AI's batch outbound calling campaigns and warm transfer capabilities support complex sales workflows while maintaining optimized latency.


Future Trends and Predictions

Emerging Technologies

OpenAI's Realtime API represents a significant advancement in voice AI capabilities, offering multimodal processing with human-like response times. (Dasha.ai) However, cost and customization limitations prevent widespread enterprise adoption.

OpenAI's Realtime API maintains a persistent WebSocket connection for dynamic interactions and offers low-latency performance, multimodal capabilities, simplified integration, and cost-effective pricing for specific use cases. (Dasha.ai)

Market Evolution

The voice AI market's 22% CAGR growth drives continued investment in latency optimization technologies. Enterprises that establish low-latency voice AI capabilities now will have competitive advantages as the market matures.

Retell AI's partnership with OpenAI positions the platform to leverage emerging AI capabilities while maintaining their focus on production-ready, low-latency voice interactions.


Conclusion

Sub-second latency represents the difference between natural AI conversations and robotic interactions that frustrate customers and damage brand perception. Our benchmark testing reveals that while Synthflow achieves the fastest response times at 420ms, Retell AI's 780ms performance offers the optimal balance of speed, features, and enterprise reliability.

Contact-center CTOs should prioritize platforms that consistently deliver sub-800ms responses while providing the integration flexibility and compliance capabilities required for production deployments. (Retell AI)

The choice between platforms ultimately depends on specific requirements: pure speed optimization, comprehensive feature sets, or global reliability. However, all successful voice AI implementations must prioritize latency as a fundamental requirement rather than an optional optimization.

As the voice AI market continues its rapid growth toward $45 billion by 2030, enterprises that invest in proven, low-latency platforms like Retell AI will be best positioned to capture market opportunities while delivering exceptional customer experiences.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is considered acceptable latency for AI voice assistants in production?

Production voice AI agents typically aim for 800ms or lower latency, with responses ideally arriving within 500ms to match human conversation patterns. Pauses longer than 800ms feel unnatural and can break the conversational flow, making sub-second response times critical for maintaining customer engagement and trust.

How does Retell AI achieve low latency compared to traditional voice platforms?

Retell AI outpaces traditional players through optimized network architecture, real-time streaming capabilities, and efficient barge-in handling. The platform delivers approximately 800ms response times by leveraging fast transcription models, optimized LLM processing, and streamlined voice synthesis, making it suitable for production contact-center deployments.

What are the key technical components for achieving sub-second voice-to-voice response times?

The fastest voice AI systems combine WebRTC for audio transmission, Deepgram's fast transcription models for speech-to-text, optimized LLMs like Llama 3 70B or 8B for processing, and high-performance text-to-speech models like Deepgram's Aura. Network architecture, AI model performance, and voice processing logic are the three critical drivers for optimization.

How does OpenAI's Realtime API compare to dedicated voice platforms like Retell AI?

OpenAI's Realtime API offers multimodal speech-to-speech capabilities with low latency but costs approximately $20 per hour of conversation, making it expensive for contact-center scale. It's limited to OpenAI-curated voices without custom cloning options, while platforms like Retell AI offer more flexibility and cost-effective pricing for production deployments.

What pricing models do these voice AI platforms use for enterprise deployments?

Retell AI uses a pay-as-you-go model with $0.07-$0.08 per minute for conversation voice engine, including 60 free minutes and 20 concurrent calls in the base setup. Pricing varies based on voice models used, with ElevenLabs voices at $0.07 and OpenAI/Deepgram voices at $0.08 per minute, plus separate fees for advanced features.

What are the main challenges contact-center CTOs face when implementing AI voice assistants?

CTOs must balance latency requirements with cost considerations, ensure scalability for concurrent calls, and maintain voice quality while meeting sub-second response times. Common challenges include integrating with existing telephony infrastructure, managing voice cloning compliance, and selecting the right LLM-voice model combination for their specific use case and budget constraints.

Sources

1. https://comparevoiceai.com/blog/latency-optimisation-voice-agent
2. https://dasha.ai/tips/openai-real-time-api-vs-retell-ai-alternatives
3. https://dev.to/cloudx/cracking-the-1-second-voice-loop-what-we-learned-after-30-stack-benchmarks-427
4. https://smallest.ai/blog/tts-benchmark-2025-smallestai-vs-elevenlabs-report
5. https://synthflow.ai/blog/retell-ai-pricing
6. https://synthflow.ai/blog/retell-ai-review
7. https://www.daily.co/blog/the-worlds-fastest-voice-bot/
8. https://www.retellai.com/blog/best-ai-voice-cloning-platforms-2025
9. https://www.retellai.com/blog/choosing-the-best-llm-for-your-voice-ai-agents
10. https://www.retellai.com/blog/why-low-latency-matters-how-retell-ai-outpaces-traditional-players
11. https://www.retellai.com/glossary/latency
12. https://www.ringly.io/comparison/best-retell-ai-alternatives

Time to hire your AI call center.

Revolutionize your call operation with Retell.